SVCR-0163-JollyRogers-770x150-012616-CW.png

The Gristle

Fictions in Collision
  • Google+

FICTIONS IN COLLISION: Whatcom County Council held a long and crowded, rancorous session on the update of the county’s Comprehensive Plan last week. The Comp Plan update is intended to shape a shared vision for the future in the context of expected growth and economic development. The reason for the ruckus was obvious—by hook and by crook, in a roundabout way, after spending nearly seven long pent-up years mincing around and avoiding the subject, County Council finally heard public testimony on the proposed coal pier at Cherry Point.

The catalyst for the eruption was amended language proposed by the Lummi Indian Business Council for Chapter 2 of the Comp Plan on land use:

“While the county recognizes the uniqueness of Cherry Point for industrial uses, the shipment of coal, or crude oil, from any new or existing pier, is detrimental to both the environment and quality of life in Whatcom County due to the severity of the environmental impacts, and should be specifically excluded from any future uses at Cherry Point.

“...Should the Cherry Point development moratorium be lifted, the shipment of coal, or crude oil, from any new pier will be prohibited.”

Two versions of this proposal exist: The rather innocuous language quoted above—the actual text submitted by Lummi Nation—that recognizes the environmental impacts of carbon fuels, and provides safe harbor against aggressive initiatives by the energy industry, and erosions crafted by Congress and through international trade agreements that threaten the health of Puget Sound. And the fictional version planted in the minds of Whatcom conservatives by front groups like the Northwest Jobs Alliance (NWJA) that teased out only the last clause of the last paragraph and labeled it a jobs killer. Enraged, conservatives showed up in droves to condemn the fictional version.

While the real and fictional versions were discussed in evening testimony as Council listened without comment, the real one is not preemptive and does not attempt to prohibit industrial uses already permitted and underway at Cherry Point. In other words, it says nothing about current conditions in the county’s heavy industry zone and the 11 employers currently there. It kills no jobs that actually exist and only narrowly constrains certain jobs that may be created in the future.

In December, congressional leaders agreed to lift the nation’s 40-year-old ban on oil exports, a historic action that reflects political and economic shifts driven by new U.S. energy initiatives like mining and fracking. The action serves to weaken provisions in the Magnuson Amendment to the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 that limit supertankers in the Puget Sound; yet it contained sufficient goodies that it gained support from Washington senators. Moreover, export provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact also on the verge of being signed into law could weaken local control over land-use decisions. The Lummi proposal—the real one—is prescient in its understanding that Whatcom County should shape its response to these energy initiatives through stated policy and developed public trusts.

Neither the real or fictional version is likely to be adopted by Council, but the Lummi submittal—as one governmental entity to another on official matters of a Comprehensive Plan update currently underway—did serve to dynamite a fiction of a different sort, that Council can hear nothing about a coal pier proposal until the proposal is immediately in front of them for approval.

For six years, the County Prosecutor’s office has discouraged Council from hearing public opinion on the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point, believing that such opinion could taint Council’s deliberations in a quasi-judicial decision on the permitting of the facility. Like a jury before a trial, Council should know as little as possible about the specific details of the proposal, the county’s legal policy theory has maintained. The Council office has even gone so far as to screen written opinion, and actively discourages (forbids) comment on GPT during Council’s open comment period, the only topic that receives such a sanction. In other words, the most transformative land use decision in Whatcom County is the only subject that is taboo.

It is a childish, one-dimensional fiction spun up by the prosecutor’s office.

The purpose of the caution is to discourage ex parte communication with representatives serving in a quasi-­judicial role. An ex parte communication is a one-sided discussion between a decision-maker and the proponent or opponent of a particular proposal that takes place outside of the formal hearing process on a quasi-judicial matter, a covert communication in the absence of representation or notification of other parties. Comments delivered at a public meeting or in written comments subject to public disclosure do not fit the definition of ex parte communication.

For six years, this ridiculous policy has stifled and strangled and silenced the public’s access to their elected representatives on a crucial matter of public policy while a permitting process has ground on and gone dark. Wrongheaded counsel has denied the public their rights to be heard. But, concerning the land use portion of a document that derives its authority from robust public involvement in all of its parts, the childish prohibition could not stand. Hence the dam breached, and discussion of the Comp Plan burst over into nearly four hours of fulsome discussion that included coal export at Cherry Point.

The outburst and fallout from one fictional grievance may have served to dislodge another fiction whose grievances are very real indeed.


blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Past Columns

January 27, 2016

‘YOU HAD ONE JOB’: Two weeks into their short 2016 session, and the Washington State Legislature is already bogged down. The 60-day session is ordinarily designed for adjustments to the… more »

January 20, 2016

A MATTER OF CONVICTION: Problems with the jail did not end when voters rejected a proposal to construct a new justice facility in November; in fact, the problems are just… more »

January 13, 2016

GO ASK ALICE: A groundbreaking study released this week finds that nearly one in three households in the Pacific Northwest struggles to afford basic standards of living, a remarkable commentary… more »

January 6, 2016

ALL CHARGED UP, NO GAS: A new year begins, and with it the oaths of office and the swearing ceremonies of new public officials elected last November. Among these, the… more »

December 30, 2015

AULD ACQUAINTANCE FORGOT: Will 2016 be the year Whatcom County finally achieves compliance with the Growth Management Act, enacted a quarter of a century ago? Perhaps; but it’s doubtful.

Whatcom… more »

December 23, 2015

COAL IN YOUR STOCKING: ’Tis the season for retail sales. Following that, the weakened Canadian dollar coupled with the closure of a major industry and its associated payroll could send… more »

December 16, 2015

Farewell: At the end of their legislative year, city and county councils took time to bid farewell to extraordinary departing members with whom they’ve collaborated and (at times, and with… more »

December 9, 2015

HOLDING PATTERNS: Fallout continues from the county’s calamitous failure to pass a funding package for additional corrections capacity. A 0.2 percent sales and use tax to construct a new facility… more »

December 2, 2015

FACTIONS OF MISCHIEF: All eyes turn this week to Paris, where the largest gathering of world leaders in history begin a multinational effort toward forging what many call the planet’s… more »

Cascadia Weekly

Home | Views | | Archives | Advertising | Contact | RSS

© 1998-2016 Cascadia Newspaper Company LLC | P.O. Box 2833, Bellingham WA 98227-2833 | (360) 647-8200