SVCR-0249-TATuesdays_770x150-CW.png

The Gristle

A Tale of Two Jails

A TALE OF TWO JAILS: It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, but with remarkable assurance the voters of Skagit County earlier this month approved a small sales tax increase for the construction and operation of a new jail facility. The 0.3 percent sales tax (three cents on a $10 purchase) will also help boost local police and fire protection. The measure was approved by nearly three voters in four (72.8 percent), and the manner and means by which this level of public confidence was achieved in Skagit may hold lessons for Whatcom as the county inches toward construction of a new jail facility of its own.

Whatcom County Council earlier this month received the latest update on the environmental assessment being prepared for a new jail site in Ferndale.

Council learned the soils analysis on the proposed jail site proved clean, with no environmental hazards, no archaeological findings, and a thick layer of clay just under the surface suitable for a foundation for a large building. Tests also indicated no particular hazards from adjacent properties, formerly a hazardous waste landfill, according to representatives of DLR Group, the planning consultants hired by the county to scope the proposed jail.

Perhaps of greater relief to council, DLR Group recommended a lower threshold of beds the county will need to meet future capacity for criminal justice, an estimate based on county population growth projections and anticipated program and policy changes to criminal justice administration. New projections indicate a jail with 550 to 600 beds, with capacity to expand in future years.

Settling on the size of the jail has proven particularly troublesome to Whatcom County.

A blue ribbon panel assembled more than a decade ago, a period of record incarcerations and fanciful notions of for-profit jails, formed almost exclusively of law enforcement personnel and prosecutors with only limited involvement from mental health and social services professionals, recommended a jail of up to 1,000 beds, with capacity for an additional 1,000 beds. The assertion was ludicrous on the face of it, projecting double the current rates of incarceration, but it fixed in place a pernicious expectation that 800 beds would be the low threshold.

Yet Whatcom’s incarceration rate of 0.21 percent of county population is already higher than the state average; moreover, empty jails tend to fill. The Sheriff’s own statistics reinforce that last point. Jail daily population in 2006 averaged 261 inmates with booking restrictions in place, relatively unchanged for more than a decade. The following year, with booking restrictions relaxed (and, coincidentally, an aggressive public relations campaign underway for a new jail), incarceration rates soared to more than 400, almost doubling. The crime rate did not increase; the capacity to warehouse inmates in a minimal security corrections facility did increase.

The jail has a strong advocate in Sheriff Bill Elfo, who has pledged to raise public safety standards in Whatcom County. Elfo has surrounded himself with a private army of ardent, influential supporters who’ve pounded a loud drum for a large jail. Yet the sound-and-fury of a $150 million regional corrections facility, paid for by tax-averse county residents (who, historically, could barely part with revenues sufficient to fund their own ambulance service) was a concept dead on arrival. Their noise, and the echoes of noise, was met by the silence of the previous county administration, the Pete-n-Dewey Show, in an abdication of leadership in public policy, a reality check withdrawn in a perverse delight that the Sheriff should hoist by his own petard and hang by a rope of his own knotting.

Which brings us back ’round to Skagit County, also in need of a new corrections facility, although on a proposed scale smaller than Whatcom. Skagit proposes a new $60 million facility that would house 400 inmates, with capacity for future expansion.

In constructing their levy for the jail, Skagit County Commissioners were innovative.

In particular, commissioners crafted an interlocal agreement that included each Skagit city, phasing and adjusting each city’s contribution according to financial analysis, getting early buy-in from city leaders in support of the proposal. Importantly, the interlocal agreement established a finance committee with a representative from each city, along with representatives from county administration and the Skagit County Sheriff’s Office. The committee will review construction and operating costs for the proposed jail and continue to adjust the contribution of cities by population and jail use.

The creation of a review committee, controlled by the cities, greatly eases the decision of Skagit commissioners and the continued advocacy of the office of Skagit County Sheriff Will Reichardt. Small wonder, with unanimous buy-in from the cities and very specific details about jail planning in advance of their levy, the measure was passed with the confidence of voters.

Where Whatcom County pursues a top-down, adversarial/advocacy approach to its jail, with planning costs topping $1.2 million, driven almost entirely by the energy and personal charisma of Sheriff Elfo, clawed back to scale by opponents of both the size and cost of the proposed facility, fought at great cost to overall enthusiasm for the plan, Skagit proposes instead a collaborative approach that involves the cities and their residents and defers much of the plan to pure technical analysis and feasibility. And while Whatcom’s expensive jail plans are more than a decade in the brewing, we predict Skagit’s jail will be completed on a much more efficient timetable.

It’s a far, far better thing Skagit has done than Whatcom has ever known.


blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Past Columns

May 18, 2016

TRAILS VERSUS JAIL: City and county executives almost always get their way with their legislative councils. Almost always. But this year, they’re experiencing some pushback from their councils on matters… more »

May 11, 2016

‘WE DRAW THE LINE’: In a perfect storm of colliding media fronts, the story of the year was eclipsed by the story of the decade in a way that can… more »

May 4, 2016

FOUR OR FOREVER: Few programs can boast the proven success of Bellingham’s Greenways. A series of three modest property tax levies since 1990 have provided revenues to acquire more than… more »

April 27, 2016

FIVE FAVOR FIVE: The Gristle was optimistic in thinking there would be consensus in the effort to draw five new voting districts for Whatcom County elections. After all, representatives from… more »

April 20, 2016

AG GAG: A berry farm in Whatcom County faces a $20,000 fine for allowing water contaminated with manure to discharge into local waterways that flow to British Columbia. Sarbanand Farms… more »

April 13, 2016

STATE OF THE COUNTY: County Executive Jack Louws delivered his annual address to Whatcom County Council last week, reviewing the year’s accomplishments and looking ahead to challenges and opportunities for… more »

April 6, 2016

PUZZLE PIECES: Late last week, the sponsor for the Gateway Pacific Terminal project announced they would suspend the environmental review process as they await the separate determination by the U.S.… more »

March 30, 2016

THE INSTRUMENTS AT HAND, 2: Legislative dysfunction at the federal and state level means local governments must sharpen their pencils to balance revenues and costs to avoid a structural deficit,… more »

March 23, 2016

THE INSTRUMENTS AT HAND: The continued blockade by the Republican conference in Olympia to any form of new revenues (despite being under a court order and sanction to create them… more »

05-2016-CFC-CW-WEB-Woodstock-Wagon.jpg

Zoots Side Bar

2016 Ad

300x250_envelope.png

160426_bfm_ad_Cascadia_web.jpg

NNC_CW-Web-ad_020516.jpg

Wine Bar A

VB_Weekly_web_ad_10-14.jpg

Cascadia Weekly

Home | Views | | Archives | Advertising | Contact | RSS

© 1998-2016 Cascadia Newspaper Company LLC | P.O. Box 2833, Bellingham WA 98227-2833 | (360) 647-8200