SVCR-0172-Gino-770x150-013116-CW.png

The Gristle

Of chains and links
  • Google+

OF CHAINS AND LINKS: “Here’s a quick summary of the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Fortnight for would-be Pacific Northwest coal exporters,” Sightline analyst Clark Williams-Derry reported last week. The Seattle-based public policy research group combed through two weeks of hazy, gauzy news on regional coal exports to conclude “when you string together all the new developments, there are more and more signs that coal export proposals are on the ropes,” Williams-Derry reported.

First up was the remarkable request by the governors of Washington and Oregon, asking the Obama Administration to review the climate-change consequences of leasing and exporting Western coal. As the Gristle noted last week, Governors Jay Inslee and John Kitzhaber urged a comprehensive analysis of the impacts of long-term investment in coal generation in Asia; raised questions about low lease rates on federal lands; and argued that the pollution and climate impacts from the expansion of coal leasing on federal lands would “dwarf almost any other action that the government could take in the foreseeable future” related to climate.

Their request is the most prominent sign the political landscape in support of coal export has shifted markedly. But it is not the only sign, as agency after agency have called for more rigorous and wider review of the impacts of coal export, as detailed in the summary of scoping comments released last week by the lead agencies overseeing the environmental impact statement being prepared for the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point.

“State-agency scoping comments reveal as much in what was unsaid as what was said,” journalist Floyd McKay commented for Crosscut. “When Gateway Pacific Terminal surfaced in 2010, it appeared to have the support of Gov. Chris Gregoire, who had ties to some SSA Marine lobbyists. She did not join Kitzhaber in requesting an area-wide review and her directors of Agriculture and Commerce publicly promoted the terminal.”

The scoping report summarized the approximately 124,000 comments collected online, in writing, and at in-person scoping meetings—the bulk of which were skeptical of or hostile to the merits of the project.

“The release of the scoping report signals that the EIS process is moving forward,” Williams-Derry commented, “yet the summary clearly demonstrates just how much public opposition the Gateway proposal faces.” And that opposition translates into political and legal difficulty.

The latter came into focus last week as the Sierra Club and other groups, including Bellingham-based RE Sources for Sustainable Communities, announced they intended to take Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) and several coal companies to court for violations of the federal Clean Water Act, the first of many expected legal challenges to coal export proposals.

Figures from BNSF itself suggest that coal trains traveling through Washington currently lose 120 tons of coal dust every day. Significantly increased volume of coal trains would only boost that pollution.

Oregon Public Broadcasting (OPB) released a complementary report earlier this month on the rail capacity and congestion issues related to coal exports. The headline—”Northwest Railroads Will Need Improvements To Handle Coal Trains”—speaks volumes.

The report draws on information from a 2011 WSDOT rail capacity assessment; raises concerns about conflicts and congestion—particuarly the conflicts between coal trains and other rail cargo; and itemizes costly infrastructure upgrades that would be needed to handle a massive boost in rail traffic.

The political difficulty was teased out in two stories out of Oregon last week.

In the first, Ambre Energy, a financially troubled Australian startup, complained that Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality was unfairly delaying permits that might allow the company to move forward with coal exports out of that state. In its public statements, Ambre signaled that it needs those permits to attract investment: “If we move forward with the DEQ permit, we can show to our investors that there is a regulatory (system) in this state that moves forward, that has clarity.”

The concern was echoed in a newsletter produced by the sponsors of the Gateway Pacific Terminal, warning that 40 percent of Washington jobs are tied to trade, implying that permitting delays could harm the state economy. The sponsors claimed GPT at full capacity will generate 4,430 jobs in the region’s economy, a number greatly inflated over past projections.

More notable was the second story. California-based Metro Ports announced the company has abandoned a proposed coal export terminal at Coos Bay. Last month the other two proponents, Japanese-based Mitsui Company and Korean Electric Power Corporation, backed out of the project. Metro Ports—the last remaining partner—allowed its exclusive negotiating contract with the Port of Coos Bay to expire.

Taken together, the stories underscore the fragility of the international coal export market, volatile in its own right as an energy commodity among many, but also terribly dependent upon investor confidence. The latter in turn are primed and pumped by assurances that government oversight may be limited and permits will be speedy. And these require that the public (and the courts) view the merits favorably. Instability in any single one of these variables renders the whole chain uncertain.

As other proposals fall to the wayside, Cherry Point looks all the stronger as the last pier left standing. It all comes down to Whatcom County, where an elected council may make the final call. Four of the seven face reelection. The stakes have become very political indeed.


blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Past Columns

January 27, 2016

‘YOU HAD ONE JOB’: Two weeks into their short 2016 session, and the Washington State Legislature is already bogged down. The 60-day session is ordinarily designed for adjustments to the… more »

January 20, 2016

A MATTER OF CONVICTION: Problems with the jail did not end when voters rejected a proposal to construct a new justice facility in November; in fact, the problems are just… more »

January 13, 2016

GO ASK ALICE: A groundbreaking study released this week finds that nearly one in three households in the Pacific Northwest struggles to afford basic standards of living, a remarkable commentary… more »

January 6, 2016

ALL CHARGED UP, NO GAS: A new year begins, and with it the oaths of office and the swearing ceremonies of new public officials elected last November. Among these, the… more »

December 30, 2015

AULD ACQUAINTANCE FORGOT: Will 2016 be the year Whatcom County finally achieves compliance with the Growth Management Act, enacted a quarter of a century ago? Perhaps; but it’s doubtful.

Whatcom… more »

December 23, 2015

COAL IN YOUR STOCKING: ’Tis the season for retail sales. Following that, the weakened Canadian dollar coupled with the closure of a major industry and its associated payroll could send… more »

December 16, 2015

Farewell: At the end of their legislative year, city and county councils took time to bid farewell to extraordinary departing members with whom they’ve collaborated and (at times, and with… more »

December 9, 2015

HOLDING PATTERNS: Fallout continues from the county’s calamitous failure to pass a funding package for additional corrections capacity. A 0.2 percent sales and use tax to construct a new facility… more »

December 2, 2015

FACTIONS OF MISCHIEF: All eyes turn this week to Paris, where the largest gathering of world leaders in history begin a multinational effort toward forging what many call the planet’s… more »

Cascadia Weekly

Home | Views | | Archives | Advertising | Contact | RSS

© 1998-2016 Cascadia Newspaper Company LLC | P.O. Box 2833, Bellingham WA 98227-2833 | (360) 647-8200