Film

Your Sister’s Sister

Making it look easy

Reviewed by Ty Burr · Wednesday, July 4, 2012

It can be a mystery why some movies work and others don’t. Lynn Shelton’s Your Sister’s Sister is as slight as they come, a three-character relationship comedy so bare bones as to be almost generic. Two sisters and a guy in a backwoods cabin, talking and drinking and occasionally misbehaving—that’s all there is. Yet that’s not all there is, since by the end of this graceful little emotional farce, you know these people, their hopes and their panic, and you wish them the very best.

The movie features Mark Duplass, the actor-filmmaker who seems to be in every movie these days, probably to raise money for his own low-budget chatfests. He’s an enjoyably schlumpy onscreen presence—I wouldn’t go so far as to call him a movie star—who strikes unusual sparks with his two costars, actresses who represent more traditional notions of Hollywood glamour.

Iris (Emily Blunt) and Hannah (Rosemarie DeWitt) are the sisters, drifting in and out of closeness. (They’re half-sisters, actually, since Blunt’s British accent has to be explained somehow).

The movie opens a year after the death of Iris’s boyfriend, who was the brother of Jack (Duplass), who gives a drunken speech at the memorial about how just because Tom is dead doesn’t mean he was a frickin’ saint. He’s in a bad place, so Iris packs him off to her family cabin north of Seattle to clear his head.

When he gets there, Hannah has already set up shop with a bottle of tequila, mourning a breakup with her longtime girlfriend. What ensues is hardly romantic. In fact, it’s downright Hobbesian: nasty, brutish, and short in a way that both characters and audience recognize as comically true. The complications kick in the next morning, when Iris arrives and confesses to Hannah her feelings for Jack—and you can just see where this is going, into a failed Neil Simon souffle of slammed doors and one-liners.

Except it doesn’t.
Your Sister’s Sister proceeds with dramatic (if not real-world) logic and humor and the sort of openhearted earnestness that doesn’t preclude satire. We laugh at these people and with them, too, since they’re all intelligent enough to see the holes they’re digging themselves into. The dialogue is largely improvised but it lacks the stammer-start of classic Mumblecore; the cast has put in the necessary work of building their characters so that the lines tumble out naturally. Some of the actors (Duplass, DeWitt) are better at this than others (Blunt), but Shelton still captures the drama of good people feeling their way through a ridiculous situation.

The director’s last film was 2009’s Humpday, which had a similar setup (two dudes, played by Duplass and Joshua Leonard, dare each other into bed to prove their PC bonafides) but was flatter and more forced. Shelton may work better with female characters; she certainly works well with DeWitt, whose Hannah has a weary, funny edge that defuses the film’s artier conceits. About two-thirds in, just when Your Sister’s Sister seems to be bogging down into slacker melodrama, a twist comes along that revs the movie’s comedic engines back up, and the energy holds until the last image, even through the tears and sisterly bonding.

It’s rare for a film to wear its low budget so lightly. Three actors and a set, yet there’s more meat on this movie’s bones—not a lot, just enough—than films that cost 100 times as much. A score by Vince Smith adds the right daubs of coloration where needed, and it only goes for indie-strum in the final moments, when I guess it’s contractually obligated. Your Sister’s Sister is no big deal, but that’s why it sort of is. Shelton makes it look so easy that you wonder why other filmmakers make it seem so hard.

Recent Articles

The bromance continues

Director JJ Abrams has followed up his sensational 2009 Star Trek reboot with a sparkling 3D sequel.

The core of the earlier film is present and correct: Chris Pine as… more »

Malick goes all in

Some audiences have trouble with experimental films. I have trouble with experimental films that aren’t experimental enough.

Truthfully, I prefer straight-up, linear narratives. Character, conflict, catharsis—you know, all those things… more »

You can’t live forever

The center holds amidst all the razzle-dazzle and razzmatazz of Baz Luhrmann’s endlessly extravagant screen adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s imperishable The Great Gatsby. As is inevitable with the Australian… more »

Back in Black

After nearly crashing and burning on his last solo flight in 2010, Iron Man returns refreshed and ready for action in this spirited third installment of the thus-far $1.2 billion-grossing… more »

High-conception comedy

A potent comedy of genetic chaos, Starbuck is pointedly contemporary and occasionally cloying, but guaranteed to draw attention for its premise and central character—a sperm donor who has ended up… more »

Like father, like son?

Suggesting all that is lost when people rush to replace the old ways with shiny new alternatives, Studio Ghibli’s gorgeously hand-drawn period romance From Up on Poppy Hill tells the… more »

Cascadia Weekly

Home | Views | Horoscope | Archives | Advertising | Contact | RSS

© 1998-2013 Cascadia Newspaper Company LLC | P.O. Box 2833, Bellingham WA 98227-2833 | (360) 647-8200